Context is important, so I need to cover same basic facts about WhatsApp and Facebook:
With the above in mind, I would break down the newfound concern with WhatsApp into three fundamental areas:
Let’s break these down, addressing the first two points in one:
Privacy and security are linked but are not synonymous. Privacy is a legal concept to be let alone and is defined differently per country based on societal norms, political and economic systems. It is closely linked to other fundamental rights like freedom of expression, belief, opinion association, assembly and political rights. Without the right to privacy these other rights cannot be fully enjoyed.
Security is the efficacy of data at any given time being free from unauthored access or interference. In a technical system, privacy is often realised through the implementation of security measures, like end-to-end encryption.
So, how secure is WhatsApp?
Security is expensive and if WhatsApp is successful in monetising WhatsApp (or even if it isn’t) Facebook has the wherewithal to be the most technically secure messenger on offer, as smaller players may just not have the capital to spend on the latest systems.
So, how Private is Your Activity on WhatsApp?
If we accept that WhatsApp encrypts all your messages, then we can accept that there is no way for them to read these messages. So then how will Facebook monetise WhatsApp without knowing what you are talking about?
The answer is by integrating new features, such as WhatsApp Pay and linking businesses directly to consumers via WhatsApp. It will also mean that your status and contact information (of you, your address book and how you link) will also be linked to Facebook thereby allowing WhatsApp to have a better understanding of you, as well as your personal and commercial habits.
So, while your messages will technically be private your activity on WhatsApp and your surrounding information garnered by WhatsApp will not be, or at least to the standard most people would be comfortable with. So, WhatsApp is a private messenger only insofar as the messages themselves are concerned but not in terms of much else.
Security and Privacy Link to Profiling
Taking into account the security and privacy of WhatsApp, the final issue is trust in Facebook which has been called into question over the last year. Because while legally WhatsApp is becoming closer to Facebook’s terms, practically what you do on WhatsApp is different to your activity on Facebook.
The counter argument to this is that you’re on Facebook already so what does it matter? This falls flat because if people were comfortable with how Facebook handles the information it currently has on them then Facebook Messenger would be a reasonable alternative. Which in all the articles setting out alternative messengers is not mentioned.
Messaging and social media are different, and privacy should be treated differently on these platforms. The apparent risk posed by WhatsApp’s updates is it allows one company whose core purpose is to monetise personal data and based in a foreign jurisdiction (with far laxer privacy laws than our own) to control and exploit one’s personal data.
This is the core issue for most people and, I would argue, why most people are looking for alternatives in Signal and Telegram. Facebook has not shown that they take privacy very seriously, because they can’t, if they took privacy too seriously their business model would crumble. Facebook need to integrate WhatsApp into their ecosystem but consumers do not need to accept that integration (insofar as they can move to alternatives).
For this reason, it is understandable that people are looking for alternatives which, currently, are less integrated across multiple platforms.
to connect with our expert